Difference between revisions of "InterLink"
(New page: thumb|right|Issue of ''Interlink'' from 2010 '''Interlink''' is an electronically-published newsletter of American Mensa devoted to internal matters wi...) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Some critics have derided ''Interlink'' as being too much of a "cheerleader" for the Mensa establishment, unlike at least some versions of ''Interloc'' (which varied a lot depending on who was the editor) which had more vigorous commentary including dissenting voices on controversial matters of internal politics. | Some critics have derided ''Interlink'' as being too much of a "cheerleader" for the Mensa establishment, unlike at least some versions of ''Interloc'' (which varied a lot depending on who was the editor) which had more vigorous commentary including dissenting voices on controversial matters of internal politics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | * [http://www.us.mensa.org/read/interlink/ Official site] | ||
[[Category:Official publications]] | [[Category:Official publications]] | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 17 October 2011
Interlink is an electronically-published newsletter of American Mensa devoted to internal matters within Mensa such as the operations of local groups and their dealings with Mensa at the national level. It is the successor to Interloc, a former paper newsletter which served this function from 1967 to 2008 as a standalone publication, and from 2008 to 2010 as a section of the Mensa Bulletin.
The intent in moving to an all-electronic publication was to cater to modern "communication trends in an age of social media", and provide a publication including links to other online resources in the American Mensa site. Cost-cutting by eliminating printing and postage expenses for Interloc may also have played a role in the decision.
Some critics have derided Interlink as being too much of a "cheerleader" for the Mensa establishment, unlike at least some versions of Interloc (which varied a lot depending on who was the editor) which had more vigorous commentary including dissenting voices on controversial matters of internal politics.
